|
October 7, 2002,
U.S. Edition

Gore as You've
Never Heard Him
By
Fareed Zakaria
In
the end most Democrats will support the president on Iraq. But they will
get there kicking and screaming, reminding the public of their internal
conflicts and ambivalence about the use of American power abroad. Perhaps
more strangely, the Democrats are endlessly debating a topic that President
Bush is delighted to discuss. What they are not talking about is the issue
that traditionally decides American elections--the economy.
Al Gore's speech
to the Commonwealth Club last week was intelligent, but ultimately about
tactics, not strategy. Gore believes that Saddam Hussein is a growing
threat to the United States and the world--and one that must be dealt
with, using force if necessary. But he dislikes the manner and sequence
in which the president is conducting policy. That makes for a column,
not a campaign. Here is the speech that Al Gore should have given:
"Three weeks ago
President Bush addressed the United Nations about the urgent need for
the disarmament of Iraq. As one of only 10 Democratic senators who supported
the gulf war in 1991, I have long believed that Saddam Hussein is a threat
to the region and the world. I fully support the president's efforts to
get United Nations inspectors back into Iraq for unfettered, unconditional
inspections.
"But what worries
me as much as the Middle East is the Middle West. The American economy
is dead in the water and the administration seems not to have noticed.
Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill confidently tells us that the economy
is poised for a recovery, as he told us six months ago, as he told us
a year ago. But the reality is stark. Every day we hear of a new round
of layoffs, a new bout of cost-cutting, a new set of economic numbers--all
worse than expected. Profits and business investment have fallen more
sharply than at any point since the Great Depression. This year the average
American household's net worth will decline for the third year running,
which has not happened since World War II. The traditional optimism of
Americans is being replaced by nervousness and gloom.
"The key force holding
back economic growth today is uncertainty: uncertainty about the future,
about the war and about chaos in its wake. The administration's loose
war talk over the summer has made matters much worse. As officials publicly
feuded, leaked battle plans and bragged that America would go it alone
in this vast undertaking, fears of a costly war with political and economic
spillover have made businesses wary of new investment and sent oil prices
shooting up. The price of oil has risen 45 percent in the last six months
and it is likely to keep going up. Without a war, we have already had
an oil shock--a stealth oil shock, whose effects will be felt by the American
people over the next year.
"While alienating
our democratic allies in Europe and Asia, the administration has spoken
of its close relationship with Saudi Arabia and other key oil-producing
states. Yet at the OPEC meetings in Osaka last week, these same governments
thumbed their noses at America and announced that they would keep oil
prices artificially high. Not only is this shortsighted but it is a hostile
act against the Western world.
"We need a new economic
strategy for America. Our economy is in grave danger of deflation--falling
prices, profits and incomes. The first line of defense is the Federal
Reserve, which we must hope will do what is necessary. Its own research
about the lessons learned from Japan's mistakes suggests the grave danger
of waiting too long and acting too weakly. Second, the secretary of the
Treasury should announce that we no longer support a strong dollar. A
fall in the value of the dollar would boost American exports and force
reform in other countries. Finally, the government must prime the economic
pump. As unemployment mounts we must raise unemployment insurance so as
to help the more than 8 million Americans who have been stranded in this
bust. It is the right thing to do for them and will also act as a powerful
stimulus to the economy. Further actions, such as targeted tax relief
for middle-class families, should be considered, but within the context
of long-term fiscal stability.
"One of the factors
that has fed uncertainty is this administration's lack of credibility
on the federal budget. In two years we have gone from record surpluses
back to Reagan-era deficits. The president has been undisciplined in both
his taxation and his spending policies, raising the prospects of large,
structural deficits. The secretary of the Treasury has become a public
embarrassment, his every statement causing jitters in the financial markets
and anxiety among ordinary Americans. The discipline and sobriety of the
Clinton-Gore years has been replaced by reckless ideology.
"Every day that
we wait, the crisis worsens, more Americans lose their jobs, their savings
and their hope. There are costs to any actions that we will take but there
are far greater costs to inaction. God bless you and God bless America."
Back
to top
|